Scientific guidance and assessment. Evaluation criteria associated with program work

Scientific guidance and assessment. Evaluation criteria associated with program work

The supervisor that is scientific of program tasks are appointed because of the Department of Sociology, concentrating on the number of systematic passions of instructors and the amount of scholastic training load.

The primary tasks of this supervisor

The primary task regarding the manager - advising and monitoring the entire process of utilization of pupil coursework.

The duties regarding the manager include:

- support in seeking the subject for the program work and also the development of the work plan;

- performing consultations that are systematic the pupil on dilemmas of work;

- support within the selection of research practices;

- advising the pupil from the variety of resources of literary works and factual product;

- monitoring the progress of operate in conformity because of the founded plan and certification that is intermediate of student;

- work assessment.

Evaluation criteria associated with program work

The primary requirements for the evaluation of coursework consist of:

- the correctness for the purpose that is stated goals for the work and their conformity with all the content of this work;

- freedom for the writer's way of the disclosure associated with topic, like the formula and reason of their very own way of resolving research dilemmas;

- persistence and structured presentation regarding the product, like thequality of the conclusion and introduction, the partnership and continuity Between the right areas of the task, between your theoretical and practical areas of the analysis;

- the grade of the analysis and also the capacity to utilize the ways of systematic research, such as the quality of analysis for sale in the literature ways to the research for the issues in mind;

- The significance that is practical of course work, like the connection of theoretical positions considered in the ongoing work, with repetition;

- the correctness associated with the utilization of sources, including conformity using the guidelines for compiling a summary of sources;

- compliance aided by the coursework design needs, precision of design, the lack of spelling and errors that are grammatical the writing (especially whenever utilizing unique terminology);

- the personal share regarding the writer to your analysis and research of the subject.

Conformity with all the guidelines of research ethics

While preparing a training course work, unique attention is compensated to pupils' conformity using the guidelines of research ethics. In no situation should plagiarism, falsification of information and quoting that is"false be applied.

Even as we mention plagiarism, we suggest direct borrowing without appropriate sources to any printed or sources that are electronic previously defended last qualifying works, master's and doctoral dissertations.

We mean to a fake or change the when we say the falsification of data source information in order to show the correctness regarding the summary (confirmation associated with the theory, etc.), plus the deliberate use of false information as a basis for analysis.

False quote means the presence of links towards the supply as soon as the offered supply will not include such information or shows a page that is invalid.

Detection of ethical breaches causes bad assessment.

The development among these violations of professional ethics may be the foundation for decreasing markings for program work, as much as grading "unsatisfactory".

Course tasks are ranked for a five-point scale. The supervisor evaluates the work taking into consideration the quality associated with the text (in other terms. its content, logic and argumentation), the theoretical and level that is methodological of, while the completeness associated with the supply database. Along with the usage and knowledge of the literary works in the subject, the correctness regarding the formula and solution of this research issue, the legitimacy and legitimacy for the conclusions work, the design that is correct of work, along with the quality of message during the protection in addition to capability to lead a medical discussion.